Are Cardinal Pitchers Cheating? Ray DeRousse June 24, 2012 Editorial 6 Comments Is this the hand of Kenny Rogers, or a Cardinal pitcher? Last week Tampa Bay Rays reliever Joel Peralta was ejected and suspended for eight games for having pine tar smeared on his glove during an appearance against the Nationals. Many players felt Peralta was punished too severely for an offense widely practiced around the game. Now the Cardinals have been pulled into the debate by former Cardinal reliever/loudmouth Chris Perez. In a radio interview detailed by the Post Dispatch, Perez made the following statement: If, before every game, they stopped and checked everybody’s gloves or something there would be one or two guys on every team that would just get popped. I’ve only played for two teams and more guys did it on the Cardinals than (Cleveland). Some members of the Cardinal pitching staff have responded to Perez’s accusations, but their answers are disconcertingly vague to say the least. For instance, Chris Carpenter made this unusually-nebulous remark in response to the charges: First of all, I don’t know what Chris (Perez) is talking about. Second, it is what it is. I understand it’s in the rule book. But it’s a situation that happens. There are probably a lot of pitchers in this game who need something at times to help them get a better grip. If you’re talking about scuffing or putting Vaseline on the ball to make it move differently, that’s a separate issue. But to do something to get a better grip on the ball? With guys throwing 100 miles per hour? I don’t think that’s cheating … pine tar, sunscreen, whatever… it’s not there to help the ball sink, cut or do funny things. It’s a tool to keep it from flying out of your hands. Uh, not exactly a denial of guilt. And then there’s Adam Wainwright‘s interesting comment regarding the use of pine tar on the mound: There’s a difference in pine tar from oil and grease, things that make the ball sink, cut or do different stuff. That’s different than doctoring a ball. If one of our pitchers gets a scuff on the side of a ball he can do all kinds of things with it. An emery board or something like that is totally different. Is it really? And then Kyle Lohse weighed in with this odd personal comment: If you’re doing something to find a better grip, I don’t have an issue with that. I don’t think hitters would, either. Sure, Kyle … the hitters have no problem with a pitcher having a competitive advantage! I think it’s pretty obvious that Perez nailed the Cardinal staff to the wall with this issue. Their obfuscation when asked direct questions about their use of pine tar all but implicates them as pitchers who use pine tar while pitching. And why is this wrong? Because Rule 8.02 of the official rules of MLB expressly forbids the use of any substance on the ball during the game: Rule 8.02: The pitcher shall not … apply a foreign substance of any kind on the ball or deface the ball in any manner. That’s pretty clear, isn’t it? What makes this particularly grotesque is the incident that occurred during the 2006 World Series. Many will remember the Cardinals famously objecting to the pine tar on the right hand of Kenny Rogers after the first inning of Game 2. Many will also remember Tony La Russa’s hesitation to pursue the issue during the game or afterwards. For a manager best-known for seeking any edge, TLR’s lack of action in that instance brought heavy criticism. I guess we now know why La Russa refused to act against Rogers – because his pitchers are doing the same thing. Wainwright addressed the Rogers incident in his answer, and it leaves a nasty taste in my mouth: If it’s something like Rogers in the World Series, that was different. That was overboard. He was getting an unfair advantage … I really don’t know how (Rogers) used it. I guess you can create more spin on your breaking ball if you use enough of it. But the reason we didn’t like it was because it was so ‘in your face.’ If he had been a little more discreet with it nothing would have ever been said. So listen to Wainwright, kids – it’s only wrong if you get caught. I’m quite disappointed to discover that the pitchers on my favorite team are not only using pine tar to enhance their performances, but that they’re so widely known throughout the game as a team that supports and practices it. Not only do they look like cheaters, but hypocrites as well. Like this article? Share it! Twitter Facebook Linkedin Google+ Pinterest jonjayfan Sadly, another great article http://www.unfilteredlens.com/ Ray DeRousse LOL Sorry for making you sad, buddy! Pingback: Jon Lester...CHEATER? - Page 5 Justanothermonkeyman Rules are rules. If it “didn’t matter” then it wouldn’t be a rule. To me that rule is explicit and clear. Therefore it should be considered cheating. Just throw the ball. Stan’s Beard Since both the writer of this article and the rest of us Cardinals fans (to get out of the way I have been a Cards fan since Bob Gibson was on the mound) there is a huge difference between greasing the ball and using pine tar or rosin or water. The latter give the pitcher a better grip on the ball (and for that reason are used the most in the playoffs where it becomes impossible to grip a ball at a certain point). The reason players have no real problem with that is because it prevents them from getting hit I have no problem with Lester using (what is obviously) pine tar to make sure the ball doesn’t slip out of his hand and wind up nailing someone. Would you rather risk Freese or Holliday taking one off the dome because the pitchers hand had numbed after 4 hours out in the 40 degree weather? I wouldn’t. Grow the fuck up guys. Dave in Peoria The rule states a pitcher shall not …. apply any foreign substance of any kind on the ball or deface the ball in any manner. The Ball… NOT the hand. If what you put on your hand gives you a better grip and it does not transfer onto the ball, then there should not be any problem. If that was strictly the case, then there would be no resin bag on the back of the mound for the pitchers to use.